article December 4, 2025

The Art of Strategic Hesitation: The Case for Reversible Transactions and Escrow

Bankers on Chain and Peter Glyman argue that reversible smart contracts and escrow mechanisms could make stablecoins viable for mainstream commercial use.

Overview

Stablecoins offer efficiency advantages over traditional banking, but face a critical vulnerability: transaction irreversibility. A single mistake—wrong address, phishing attack, or fraud—results in irretrievable loss, unlike traditional banking which offers dispute resolution.

Bankers on Chain and guest contributor Peter Glyman propose that reversible smart contracts and escrow mechanisms could bridge this gap, making stablecoins viable for mainstream commercial use while preserving their efficiency benefits.

Unlike Bitcoin or Ethereum (primarily speculative), stablecoins function as payment infrastructure for genuine commerce, necessitating protections similar to traditional wire transfers.

Proposed Solutions

The authors advocate three mechanisms to enable reversibility:

  • Time-locked Transactions: Allow dispute periods before final settlement, giving parties time to identify and contest errors
  • Conditional Escrow Release: Tie fund release to specific verifications or conditions, protecting both parties in transactions
  • Arbitration Systems: Provide structured conflict resolution for disputed transactions

Practical Applications

These mechanisms unlock real-world use cases where irreversibility is a dealbreaker:

  • Freelance Work: Escrow protects both clients and contractors in milestone-based payments
  • International Trade: Conditional release tied to shipping confirmations and quality verification
  • Real Estate: Complex transactions requiring multiple verification steps before final settlement
  • Payroll Management: Time-locked transactions allow error correction before employee payment

Opportunity for Banks

Rather than viewing stablecoins as competition, reversible transactions represent an upgrade financial institutions can offer existing customers. Banks can leverage their trusted intermediary roles to provide:

  • Dispute resolution services for stablecoin transactions
  • Escrow management with programmable conditions
  • Arbitration and verification services
  • Compliance oversight for commercial stablecoin payments

The article positions reversible transactions as the bridge between blockchain efficiency and traditional banking protections—a critical missing piece for stablecoin adoption in mainstream commerce.

Original Source

Read the Full Article

Bankers on Chain provides comprehensive analysis.

Read on Bankers on Chain →