Modern payments you can undo
Because funds are held in escrow first, a review window and rollback triggers can reverse a payment before it settles. Recourse raw rails can’t offer.
Transactions
Reversibility lives in the Confirm phase of the Coinbax Execution Framework: the window between funding and settlement where review windows, fraud signals, and manual holds can still recall a payment. After Settle, finality is real, which is exactly why Confirm exists.
A window to act before funds are final
Escrow creates the window
Because a payment is held in escrow before release, there is a defined window in which it can still be recalled, unlike a raw transfer, which is final the moment it confirms.
Triggers can roll it back
Review windows, fraud signals, and manual holds can cancel or recall a payment before the escrow releases to the recipient.
Everything stays on-chain
Reversals are executed by the contract and recorded, so the outcome is transparent and auditable.
Stop a payment before it’s gone for good
Fraud caught in time
A recall window turns "we lost the funds" into "we stopped the payment," the difference institutions need.
Familiar recourse
Customers get protection closer to the chargeback and recall behavior they expect from traditional payments.
No custody tradeoff
Reversibility comes from escrow rules, not from a third party holding the funds.
Questions
Because the payment is held in escrow before it releases, there is a defined window in which it can still be recalled, unlike a raw transfer, which is final the moment it confirms.
A review window elapsing, a fraud signal, or a manual hold. Any of these can cancel or recall a payment before the escrow releases to the recipient, during the Confirm phase of the Coinbax Execution Framework.
No. The recall comes from the escrow contract’s rules, not from Coinbax or a third party holding the funds. The contracts behind it have been independently audited by Consensys Diligence.
No. Once a payment reaches Settle it is final on-chain. That is exactly why the Confirm window exists: to catch and reverse problems while it can still be undone, not after.
It gives customers protection closer to the recall and chargeback behavior they expect from traditional payments, but it is enforced on-chain before settlement rather than clawed back weeks later.
Yes. Reversals are executed by the contract and recorded on a tamper-evident trail, backed by SOC 2 attestation and audited smart contracts, so every recall is transparent and provable.